Double-Gauge Invariant Local Quantum Field Theory of Charges and Dirac Magnetic Monopoles next up previous
Next: References

Double-Gauge Invariant Local Quantum Field Theory of Charges and Dirac Magnetic Monopoles

H. Kleinert
Institut für Theoretische Physik
Freie Universität Berlin
Arnimallee 14 D - 1000 Berlin 33

Abstract:

Exploiting the recently found extra monopole gauge symmetry which ensures the physical irrelevance of the Dirac strings in electromagnetism with Dirac magnetic monopoles, we formulate a local quantum field theory of charges and monopoles.

1) In a recent note [1] we have pointed out the existence of an extra gauge symmetry in the action describing the electromagnetic forces between a particle of charge e on a worldline L' with a 4-current

  equation24

and a Dirac magnetic monopole [2] of charge g on a worldline L with a current

  equation28

The action reads

  eqnarray31

where tex2html_wrap_inline478 is the usual field strength while tex2html_wrap_inline480 is what we have called the monopole gauge field, describing the monopole via the dual

  equation45

of the tex2html_wrap_inline482 -function on the worldsheet S of the Dirac string

  equation53

in the following way:

  equation62

The physically observable field strength is tex2html_wrap_inline486 and the finiteness of the action tex2html_wrap_inline488 containing the monopole gauge field enforces the presence of a tex2html_wrap_inline482 -function in tex2html_wrap_inline492 on the world surface precisely equal to tex2html_wrap_inline480 so that tex2html_wrap_inline496 . This is why the action tex2html_wrap_inline488 is regular and does not contain a square of a tex2html_wrap_inline482 -function as the expression (3) might initially suggest.
The worldline of the monopole is, of course, the boundary line of the string's worldsheet S, as expressed by Stokes' theorem:

  equation78

This implies that the monopole gauge field satisfies the equation

  equation85

2) As noted in [1], the action (3) is invariant under the monopole gauge transformations

  equation95

with integrable vector functions tex2html_wrap_inline504 , which have the general form

  equation100

with the sum running over arbitrary choices of 3-volumes V and tex2html_wrap_inline510 being the tex2html_wrap_inline482 -function on these volumes:

  eqnarray103

The monopole gauge transformations (9) express the freedom of distorting the Dirac strings without changing the boundary lines, as can be seen from the transformation

  eqnarray115

if V is the volume enclosed by the two surfaces tex2html_wrap_inline516 and tex2html_wrap_inline518 with a common boundary line L. For some monopole gauge transformations the string distortions are trivial, namely those of the form tex2html_wrap_inline522 with tex2html_wrap_inline524 , where tex2html_wrap_inline526 is the tex2html_wrap_inline482 -function on the four-volume tex2html_wrap_inline530 ,

  eqnarray122

These do not give any change in tex2html_wrap_inline480 since they are a submanifold of the original gauge transformations tex2html_wrap_inline534 . We may remove them from tex2html_wrap_inline536 by a gauge-fixing condition such as

  equation136

where tex2html_wrap_inline538 is an arbitrary fixed unit vector.
The remaining monopole gauge freedom can be used to bring all Dirac strings to a standard shape so that tex2html_wrap_inline540 becomes a function of only the boundary lines L. In fact, with the above tex2html_wrap_inline538 we may always reach the axial monopole gauge defined by

  equation141

To see this we take tex2html_wrap_inline538 along the 4-axis and consider the gauge fixing equations

  eqnarray145

With (14) we have tex2html_wrap_inline550 and tex2html_wrap_inline552 could certainly all be determined if they were arbitrary real functions. But the same thing is possible for the restricted class of gauge functions at hand, with the form (10). This is seen most easily by approximating the 4-space by a fine-grained hypercubic lattice of spacing tex2html_wrap_inline556 and imagining tex2html_wrap_inline480 to be functions defined on the plaquettes. The tex2html_wrap_inline482 -functions correspond to integer-valued functions on sites [ tex2html_wrap_inline562 ], on links [ tex2html_wrap_inline564 ], or plaquettes [ tex2html_wrap_inline566 ], and the derivatives tex2html_wrap_inline568 to tex2html_wrap_inline570 times lattice differences tex2html_wrap_inline572 across links. Thus tex2html_wrap_inline574 can be written as tex2html_wrap_inline576 with integer tex2html_wrap_inline578 . The gauge fixing in (16) with the restricted gauge functions amounts then to solving a set of integer-valued equations of the type

  eqnarray157

with tex2html_wrap_inline580 . This is always possible as ha sbeen shown with similar equations in Ref. [4]. With the gauge being fixed we can solve Eq. (8) uniquely by

  equation163

3) If we want to turn the classical theory associated with (3) into a quantum field theory, we have to take the amplitude tex2html_wrap_inline582 and form the path integral over all fluctuating grand-canonical ensembles of world lines L' and worldsheets S. For the world lines it is well known that such a path integral can be replaced by a functional integral over a single fluctuating field [3]. In the absence of monopoles this gives rise, for charged electrons, to the standard quantum field theory of electromagnetism (QED) in which the electric interaction

  equation172

is replaced by the second quantized field action

  eqnarray177

where tex2html_wrap_inline590 is the mass of the electron and tex2html_wrap_inline592 are the standard Dirac fields of the electron.

4) For the monopoles, the situation is initially much more involved since the path integral is a sum over a grand-canonical ensemble of surfaces S. Up to date, there exists no satisfactory second-quantized field theory which could replace such a sum. The vacuum fluctuations of some non-abelian gauge theory will eventually do the job. Fortunately, however, due to the monopole gauge invariance of the action (3) under (9), most configurations of the surfaces S are physically irrelevant. If we fix the gauge as described above, the monopole gauge field is uniquely given by Eq. (18) and thus depend only on the orbital worldlines L of the monopoles via (2). But then we can rewrite the action with the fixed monopole gauge as

  eqnarray187

where tex2html_wrap_inline600 are now two arbitrary fluctuating fields (i.e., tex2html_wrap_inline602 is no longer of the restricted form implied by (6)]. The latter field plays the role of a Lagrange multiplyer to enforce the specific gauge relation (18). The two action terms in which it apears have been denoted by tex2html_wrap_inline604 and tex2html_wrap_inline606 . We have omitted a gauge fixing term for the ordinary electromagnetic gauge since it is standard. The monopole enters now via the magnetic current coupling

  equation215

where tex2html_wrap_inline608 is short for

  equation222

The ensemble of monopole orbits L can now be turned into a a single fluctuating field as usual. If monopoles are spin 1/2 particles, this obviously replaces [just as in going from (19) to (20)] the magnetic interaction (22) by

  eqnarray230

where tex2html_wrap_inline614 is the Dirac field of the monopole. The total gauge-fixed field action is therefore

  equation235

Before gauge fixing, the total path integral for the fluctuating theory involves the fields tex2html_wrap_inline616 and the gauge fields tex2html_wrap_inline618 and tex2html_wrap_inline574 . While the path integrals over the first three fields are defined in the standard way as being the product, over all sites x of the above specified hypercubic lattice, of integrals over Grassmann variables tex2html_wrap_inline624 and c-number variables tex2html_wrap_inline628 , the latter is of a new type: It is defined as the product, over all plaquettes of the lattice, of discrete sums over all integers tex2html_wrap_inline578 with tex2html_wrap_inline632 .

After the gauge fixing, the path integrand will in general contain Fadeev-Popov determinants. For the original gauge transformation tex2html_wrap_inline534 , any standard gauge fixing, for instance the axial one tex2html_wrap_inline636 , gives only a trivial constant Fadeev-Popov determinant which can be ignored. The same thing happens with the monopole gauge fixing. At the level of the hypercubic lattice, Kronecker tex2html_wrap_inline482 's in the path integrand ensure conditions like (16) which corespond to tex2html_wrap_inline640 Also such conditions produce only trivial constant Fadeev-Popov determinants [4], so that there is no need to introduce compensating fermionic ghost fields.

The fluctuations in the gauge-fixed action (25) involves only path integrals over ordinary Grassmann fields tex2html_wrap_inline616 and c-number fields tex2html_wrap_inline646 . This completes the construction of the quantum field theory of electric charges and Dirac monopoles [5].

Notice that the dependence of this theory on the monopole gauge degree of freedom is much more dramatic than in pure QED. There, it was only a polarization degree of freedom which was made irrelevant by the electromagnetic gauge transformation tex2html_wrap_inline534 . Here the monopole gauge transformations (9) reduce the dimensionality of the fluctuations from surfaces S to lines L.

5) Let us end by remarking that by integrating out the tex2html_wrap_inline618 field in the classical action (3) we obtain the interaction

  eqnarray259

The third term is the usual electric current-current interaction. The first two terms are seen, via (8), to reduce to the magnetic current-current interaction

  equation278

The last term is the current-current interaction between magnetic and electric currents. In the axial gauge with (18) it becomes

  equation287

These are the correct current-current interactions which can be found in the textbooks [6].
 




next up previous
Next: References

Hagen Kleinert
Wed Dec 18 11:05:29 MET 1996